Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Luis A. Estable's avatar

The right to procreate? If they had not done it, you or we would be now here to ask that question. It is not a right, it is a given that we procreate. Even the Bible encourages it, "Be fruitful and multiply." I cannot imagine any argument having an issue with procreation. How could it be otherwise?

Expand full comment
Tom Merrill's avatar

Schopenhauer, in one of his many pellucid essays, correctly observed that one way academic philosophers--who will always tell you whatever you want to hear he notes--attempt to discredit thinkers like himself who never write to accommodate audience biases, but only to set down the quite unbeautiful facts, is by ignoring them, by pretending they don't exist. By confining them to the oubliette. So I am hardly surprised to be the first to post a comment here. The crowd-pleasing professors he was referring to share everything in common with the generality, in self-servingly sticking to preferred, approved, and indeed expected opinion. Khayyam, Buddha, Sophocles, Aristotle, etc., when they say what they say in the quotes above are not crowd-pleasers, but rare refreshment in this desert of universal illusion, where lovely mirages alone are well-received. Schopenhauer's contempt for them was condign. Nonetheless he advanced the principle that I am you and you are me, and thus while he couldn't help hating people sometimes--as he honestly confesses--his fundamental ethics always took precedence. His philosophy's supreme concern is ethics. I have wondered sometimes if that is why he was Einstein's most favored philosopher, who ranked him above even Plato and Aristotle.

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts