Did Lord Byron inspire Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein?
Also, is Mary Shelley's famous novel a reflection on the moral issues of procreation?
REFLECTIONS ON FRANKENSTEIN
by Michael R. Burch
I believe the tragic hero of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is its rebellious creature, just as the tragic hero of John Milton's Paradise Lost is its rebellious angel. And for the same reason: the unjustness of their creators. Surely no one sympathizes with Dr. Frankenstein or Jehovah: all our sympathies are with their victims of their "creativity."
Furthermore, I believe Mary Shelley was posing important philosophical questions in her famous novel: Do any of us have the right to "play god" by bringing new life into a world where we cannot guarantee the happiness of our creations? Do human beings have the right to reproduce?
I believe Mary Shelley wrote a probing philosophical book that may have been based on, or greatly influenced by, Lord Byron's pessimistic view of his assumed Creator, the biblical "god" Yahweh aka Jehovah. From what I have read on the subject, her husband Percy Bysshe Shelley, an atheist, had to "talk down" Byron at times from black moods induced by his dark religion, Christianity, with its diabolical "god" who creates human beings with needs and desires, damns them for acting on the needs and desires he instilled in them, then predestines (predetermines) which ones will go to heaven and hell before they are born (according to the epistles of the apostle Paul and other hard-to-credit Bible verses).
My discovery of Percy Shelley "talking down" Byron led me to wonder whether Byron's dark view of his Creator may have inspired Mary Shelley's overambitious doctor. After all, she and Percy were houseguests of Byron when she came up with the story. In fact, it was Byron's idea that he and his houseguest should create ghost stories to entertain each other that led to Mary Shelley's novel being written.
But in any case Victor Frankenstein pales in comparison to Jehovah, who condemned all his creations to suffer and die, destroyed all but a handful in the Great Flood, then serial-murdered children, toddlers, infants, babies and animals in the Plagues of Egypt and various other calamities—to this day, if modern "prophets" like Pat Robertson are to be believed. Anyone who claims Jehovah was "good" has not read what the Bible actually says, or has not read it honestly. The biblical god Jehovah was not remotely good, praiseworthy or trustworthy. Hell, even the greatest Christian poets have struggled with the problem that no one can possibly love or trust Jehovah as he is portrayed in the Bible. After all, Jehovah murdered Adam, Eve and everyone we ever loved, including our pets! Consequently, the greatest Christian poets had little or nothing to do with the dubious trio of biblical "gods" or the "good news" of the bloody "atonement." In evidence:
• Dante turned for salvation to the woman he loved, Beatrice, and the pagan poet Virgil, not Jehovah or Christ. Those are very curious choices for someone who has been called the greatest of all Christian poets!
• John Milton intended to "justify the ways of God to man," but only managed to make Jehovah seem like a heartless tyrant and Christ like a blitzkrieging Rommel, while turning Adam, Eve and Lucifer into romantic heroes for the ages. Milton gave the "atonement" one enjambed line in his massive epic, as if the idea might have embarrassed him. Or perhaps he didn't believe in the "atonement" himself but thought he couldn't leave it out entirely. Does any educated human being want to believe in primitive, bloodthirsty gods, much less admit it in public? No wonder Milton rushed through that bit of spin, if he considered it impossible or dangerous to leave out.
• William Blake, probably the English language's most spiritual major poet, and arguably England's greatest prophet, called the biblical god NOBODADDY because no one would want him for a father. Blake also claimed to be his own Christ and denied that he needed anyone to "save" him.
• Walt Whitman, the father of American poetry who created modern free verse by enlisting the cadences of the King James Bible, also claimed to be his own Christ. He saw all earthly religions as equals but had no need for any of them himself.
• Emily Dickinson, the mother of American poetry and perhaps its most spiritual poet along with Whitman, compared Jehovah to a burglar and a banker. Dickinson entered Mount Holyoke Female Seminary in 1847. At the time Holyoke classified its students into three categories: "established Christians," those who "expressed hope" and those "without hope." Dickinson was a "no hoper." In one of her most powerful poems, Dickinson wrote that after groping for answers "from Blank to Blank" she shut her eyes and discovered "'Twas lighter—to be Blind" (not exactly an endorsement of Jehovah, Christ, the Bible or the Christian religion).
Dante, Milton, Blake, Whitman and Dickinson have each been called a "sect of one." These are the most major "Christian" poets, and yet no one can find a hint of orthodoxy in their poems. Where do they praise Jehovah for creating them? Where do they praise Christ for saving them? And Byron had an even darker vision of Jehovah. Did Byron see himself as a monster, the victim of an unjust Creator? He was born deformed with a club foot—was that his fault, or God's? If the rumors are true that Byron committed incest, who created such desires in his loins—was the fault his, or God's?
Blake posed similar questions in his companion poems "The Lamb" and "The Tyger": What is the nature of a Creator who creates innocent, defenseless lambs, but also savage predators who rip lambs to shreds without an ounce of pity? Is the tiger responsible for its savage nature? If not, who is? What is the nature of such a Creator, what are his intentions toward us, and why should we trust him?
While I admit that my theory is speculative, I believe it makes sense:
Mary and Percy Shelley were houseguests of Lord Byron at the time Frankenstein was conceived.
Byron had a clubfoot and a "monstrous" reputation that included accusations of incest.
Percy Shelley was aware of Byron's dark views of his Creator and sometimes "talked him down" during his black moods.
Byron challenged his houseguests to enter into a ghost-story-telling competition.
Did Mary Shelley make Byron the model for her story's protagonist, with his Creator the model for the villain?
In any case, I take Mary Shelley's book to raise the question: "Does anyone have the right to bring new life into such a dark, dangerous world so full of unhappiness?" That question might be asked not only of human scientists, but also of prospective parents and the Creator himself, if such a being exists.
A highly idiosyncratic reading — especially of Dante. After all, both Beatrice and Virgil lead Dante through Hell and Purgatory to the Beatific Vision. That’s a vision of the Biblical God. I’m too lazy to check — but seem to remember that this radiant and much celebrated passage occurs in the final canto of the Paradiso.
I myself join those who prefer the Inferno. But even there Dante frequently rejoices in the eternal punishment of evildoers. What do you make of the passage about Capaneus, who Prometheus-like challenged the status of Zeus? Can you cite textual evidence that Dante blames God for the fate of Capaneus?
Regarding Milton, there is of course the “Paradise Regained.” I grant you that this is an inferior product. But there’s also the “Samson Agonistes” and the “Ode on the Morning of Christ’s Nativity” — both of which are first rate.
Blake I’ll grant you — as radically heterodox, not as anti-Christian. “Mock on, mock on, Voltaire, Rousseau….” Blake also greatly esteemed St. Teresa of Avila.
Aren’t you disregarding much of the plot of “Frankenstein”? After all, Victor is equated with Prometheus, not with God. God in the Biblical account creates Adam and gives him a mate. Frankenstein fashions the Fiend (as he calls him) and then, ultimately, refuses to grant him his mate. This is what infuriates the Fiend. It’s hard to see, also, how Byron would take vengeance on the Creator the way that the Fiend takes vengeance on Frankenstein. God is he “whom thunder hath made greater.”
I despise the unrelenting sentimentality in the speaking styles of both Victor and the Fiend. Won’t they ever stop whining?
In this context, I ignore Whitman and Dickinson. Poe is a greater poet than either. Although not Irish, he could also whip them in a fistfight.
It’s important to realize here that I’m not a literalist even when it comes to most passages in the Bible. If great works of literature only had one reading, would they be worth our time? I suspect that the literalism imposed on you in your youth has colored your understanding of the Biblical texts. That’s fine if it’s how you want to read them. But it’s not the only way.